SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 688

R.C.LAHOTI, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Mayzur Islam Mallick – Respondent


Judgment

Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-M/s. Caltex (India) Ltd., the predecessor-in-interest of the appellant M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., entered into two agreements both dated 30th of November, 1975 with respondent No. 5 as the sole proprietor carrying on business in the name and style of M/s. National Oil Trading Co., granting respond­ent No. 5 dealership in kerosene at two places of business-Bagnan and Kolaghat. These agreements were replaced by two agreements both dated 6th of July, 1984 entered into by the appellant which respond­ent No. 5 as the sole proprietor carrying on business under the firm name and style of M/s. National Oil Trading Co. granting him dealer­ship in kerosene at Bagnan and Kolaghat. The material parts of Clauses 14 and 17 of these agreements are as follows:

“14. The dealer shall not sell, assign, mortgage or part with or otherwise transfer his interest in the dealership or the right, inter­est or benefit conferred on him by this agreement to any person. In the event of the dealer being a partnership firm any change in the constitution of the firm, whether by retirement, introduction of new partners or otherwise howsoever will not be permitted wi




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top