SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 734

M.SRINIVASAN, B.N.KIRPAL, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Apar Private LTD. – Respondent


Order

The judgment of the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court reported in 1985 (22) ELT 6441 is called in question in these appeals by special leave before us. The question which arose for consideration before the Bombay High Court related to the levy of customs duty under the provi­sions of the Sea Customs Act.

2. The brief facts on which the Bombay High Court proceeded were that when the goods of the respondents entered the territorial waters of India from the foreign country as also on the day they were stored in the bonded warehouse, they were wholly exempt from payment of basic customs duty under a notification issues by the Central Government Act, 1962. When these goods were sought to be removed from the bonded warehouse, the exemption notification had been rescinded and the exemption granted thereunder was withdrawn.

3. The case of the respondents was that on the day when the goods entered the territotial waters, that is the point of time when the taxable event under Section 12 occurred; and as the duty was nil on that day, therefore the question of paying any duty with reference to a subsequent point of time, nemely, when the goods were removed from the warehouse did not aris







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top