SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 883

R.C.LAHOTI, N.S.HEGDE
Ranadip Shipping And Transport Company Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Customs – Respondent


Judgment

R.C. Lahoti, J.-Notice under proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 was issued on 13th May, 1985 and served on M/s. Ranadip Shipping & Transport Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., the appellant, (hereinafter RST, for short) and M/s. Sea Land Service Incorporated (the respondent No. 2) (hereinafter SLS, for short) requiring them to show cause why duty amounting to Rs. 37,97,434/- be not levied and recovered from them apart from assessing penalty and other action on account of short levy occasioned by wilful misstatement and suppres­sion of facts by the importers, M/s. RST and their principals, M/s. SLS. It is not disputed that in the transaction in question the appel­lant had acted in the capacity of agent of respondent No. 2. The adjudicating authority, i.e., the Collector of Customs, Bombay by Order-In-Original dated 3.5.1988 held as under :

(1) The chassis should be valued on the basis of the valuation shown in the show cause notice and the demand notice i.e. at the unit price US$ 2,535/- per chassis CIF Bombay. The rate of duty and the exchange should be calculated on the rate prevailing on the date of filing of the 4 Bs/E in respect of the 84 c











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top