SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 900

G.T.NANAVATI, S.N.PHUKAN
Oriental Insurance Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Gokulprasad Manikial Agarwal – Respondent


Judgment

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

2. The respondent-Gokulprasad Maniklal Agarwal was working as an Assistant Administrative Officer with the Appellant insurance company. He challenged initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him by the appellant by filing Writ Petition No. 2128/84 in the High Court of Bombay. While the departmental proceedings were pending a promotion list for the Western Zone for promotion to the post of Administrative Officer was published by the appellant on 8.2.1998. The respondent’s name appeared at serial No. 1. Instead of promoting him, by letter dated 22.2.1988; the respondent wsa informed by the appellant that as the disciplinary proceedings were pending against him his promotion to the rank of Administrative Officer has been kept in abeyance till the result of the enquiry.

3. The disciplinary proceedings ended with an order dated 19.11.1993 whereby the respondent was awarded penalty of reduction in basic pay be one stage in the time scale of pay on permanent basis. The respond­ent feeling aggrieved by the letter dated 22.2.1988 and the order of punishment dated 19.11.1993, amended the Writ Petition and challenged the said letter and order also. T







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top