SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 933

K.VENKATASWAMI, S.S.M.QUADRI
Mahesh Balmiki Munna – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Judgment

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. -Leave is granted limited to the ques­tion of nature of offence.

2. The appellant along with two others wa tried for committing muder of one Satish (herinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’) and causing injuries with knife to Harkishan ans was convicted for offences pun­ishable under Section 302 and 324 I.P.C. read with Section 34 I.P.C. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and three years rigrous impris­onment for the said offences by learned Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 198 of 1981 on July 17, 1982. A Division Bench of the High Court of the Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Crininal Appeal No. 171 of 1982 confirmed his conviction under Sections 302 and 324 I.P.C. and sentence for the said offences and dismissed his appeal on April 30, 1998. Against the judgment and order of the High Court, he is in appeal before this Court.

3. Dr. T.N. Singh, learned senior counsel for the appellant, has urged that it is a case falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 I.P.C and, in any event, as the appellant had given only a single blow with knife, he ought not to have been convicted under Section 302 I.P.C.; his conviction could only be under Section 304 I



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top