G.B.PATTANAIK, S.S.M.QUADRI
Naresh Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Karan – Respondent
Order
Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the order of the Allahabad High Court, releasing the accused Raj Karan on bail. The High Court appears to have accepted the plea of the accused that he was on election duty at the relevant point of time and, accordingly, has released him on bail. No attention has been focussed with regard to the nature of offence or any other materials. Such an order, on the face of it, cannot be sustained. Mr. Lalit, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the accused-respondent however submitted that the accused has been released on bail since April 1998 and more than eight months have elapsed in the meantime and there is no allegation of any further overt act or tampering with the prosecution evidence and, consequently, the grant of bail should not be cancelled. Though this is a vital consideration, yet the High Court having not focussed its attention on all the relevant materials and having released the accused Raj Karan on bail, we think it appropriate to remit the matter to the High Court for reconsideration. More so, when in Criminal Appeal No. 23 of 1999, we have remitted the question of reconsideration for the bail of accused Suresh Pal S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.