SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1194

R.P.SETHI, S.P.KURDUKAR
Ramesh Chand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Udham Singh Kamal – Respondent


Judgment

S.P. Kurdukar, J.-These two civil appeals can be conveniently dis­posed of by this common judgment since they are filed against the common order dated 6th August, 1996 passed by the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 631 of 1994. Civil Appeal No. 3119 of 1997 is filed by Ramesh Chand Sharma who has been promoted to the selection post as Assistant Legislative Draftsman (Hindi) class-II (gazetted) on being recommended by the Departmental Promotion Committee. Civil Appeal No. 3120 of 1997 is filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh.

2. Feeder cadre to the selection post is Translator-cum-Legal Assist­ant. Under the relevant rules called “Recruitment and Promotion Rules” framed by the Government of Himachal Pradesh prescribed the condition precedent of at least three years experience in a feeder cadre i.e. Translator-cum-Legislative Assistant or Proof Reader. The Government of Himachal Pradesh accepted the recommendation of the DPC and promot­ed Ramesh Chand Sharma, the appellant as Assistant Legislative Drafts­man (Hindi) class-II (Gazetted). Although, he was junior to respondent No. 1- Udham Singh Kamal in service under the followin


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top