SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1271

S.B.MAJMUDAR, UMESH C.BANERJEE
Jnanedaya Yogam – Appellant
Versus
K. K. Pankajakshy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Majmudar, J.-Leave granted.

2. By consent of learned counsel for the parties, we have heard these appeals finally and the same are being disposed of this common judgment.

3. A writ petition was filed in the Kerala High Court by common Respondent No. 1 herein. She challenged the notification issued by the State of Kerala under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The said notification dated 22nd March, 1988 issued under Section 4 of the Act provided that land admeasuring 0.028 cents situated in Kodiyeri village in Tellicherry Taluk of Cannonore district was needed or likely to be needed for a public purpose for providing passage to Pallivetta procession of Sree Jagannath Temple, Tellicherry. The said notification was issued was issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 read with Section 17(4) of the Act. It is this notification which was successfully challenged by Respondent no. 1 before the High Court in her writ petition wherein the present appellants were joined as Respondent nos. 4 and 5 while the State Authorities were joined as Respondents nos. 1, 2, 3 and 6. The case of Respondent no. 1 before the High Court in the wri












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top