K.T.THOMAS, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Thomas Antony – Appellant
Versus
Varkey Varkey – Respondent
Judgment
Per D.P. Mohapatra, J.-
While making a reference to the Tribunal mandatory the legislature cannot be said to have intended that even a patently frivolous, malafide and illegal plea of tenancy taken by a party merely to delay the proceeding and to remain in possession of the property is also to be referred to the Tribunal. The statutory provisions, in our considered view, envisage a case where a bonafide and legally sustainable plea of tenancy is taken by the party, that question shall be referred to the Tribunal. (Para 20)
(ii) Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963-Section 125(6) - Reference to Tribunal to decide question regarding status of a person as a tenant or kudikidappukaran-Building nature of findings of Tribunal-Trial Court (Court making reference) has to accept decision of Tribunal-Trial Court cannot record contrary finding on question of status of a person-Appellate Court is not precluded from going into correctness of findings of Tribunal.
From the statutory scheme of Section 125 it is clear that when a question regarding status of a person as a tenant or as a kudikidappukaran arises in any suit or proceeding before a civil Court that Court shall refer the matt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.