G.B.PATTANAIK, N.S.HEGDE
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Muddappa – Respondent
ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against Accused 3 alone who was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge under Section 302 IPC. But, on appeal, the High Court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and instead, convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC. For such conviction, the High Court also examined the circumstances under which the blow was inflicted by the accused on the deceased and, on consideration of the provisions of Section 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, the High Court, instead of sentencing him, directed to release the accused on admonition.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant is not in a position to assail the acquittal of the accused under Section 302 IPC, but he vehemently contends that the Court did not bear in mind germane considerations for releasing the accused on probation after convicting him under Section 304 Part II IPC. Whether the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act could be extended in any particular case depends upon the circumstances of that case. Admittedly, there is no statutory bar for application of the Act to an offence under Section 304 Part II where the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.