SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 354

G.T.NANAVATI, S.N.PHUKAN
Secretary Indian Tea Association – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Kumar Barat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Phukan, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17th March, 1999 of the Calcutta High Court in appellate jurisdiction whereby order of the learned single Judge dated 24th July 1998 passed in W.P. No. 155 of 1998 was affirmed. The learned single Judge directed the State Government to make reference under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3. Briefly stated facts are as follows :-

Respondent No. 1 was employed as Joint Secretary of Indian Tea Association - appellant. On 27th November, 1995, respondent No. 1 was dismissed from service for disobeying an order of transfer. He complained of his dismissal to Labour Commissioner, Government of West Bengal. Conciliation proceedings under Section 12 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the Act) were held and appellant submitted its comments stating that respondent No. 1 was not a workman. A failure report dated 2nd July, 1997 was submitted by the Joint Labour Commissioner, recommending a reference, as according to him, the question whether respondent No. 1 was a workman required adjudication. The Government did not act, therefore, respondent No. 1 moved Calcutta High Court. The High Court



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top