SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 33

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
Mammu – Appellant
Versus
Hari Mohan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mohapatra, J.-This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order of the High Court of Kerala dated 29th November, 1996 in CRP No. 2495 of 1989. The said revision petition was filed by the respondent herein under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) challenging the Judgment dated 31.1.1989 of the Land Reforms Appellate Authority, Thrissur in AA No. 93/88. The High Court having allowed the revision petition on the finding that the respondent therein is not a Kudikidappukaran with respect to the structure in question. The respondent in the revision petition has filed this appeal.

2. The relevant facts necessary for appreciating the controversy may be stated thus:

The respondent Hari Mohan owns an extent of 28.5 cents of property in Survey No. 683/3 of Lokamaleswaram Village. In that property there is a building with four sets of rooms originally constructed as shop rooms. The said four rooms were separately let out to four persons including the appellant. All the four tenants filed original applications before the Land Tribunal for purchase of Kudikidappu right under Section 80-B of the Act. The application filed by the appel





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top