SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 610

RUMA PAL, D.P.WADHWA
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Elector Graphites LTD. , Indore – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Wadhwa, J.-The question of law which falls for consideration is :

whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(1)(a) in view of the clear cut provisions of Section 143(1)(a), 143(1A) and 234?

2. Respondent, the assessee, filed its return of income for the assessment year 1989-90. The return was filed on December 29, 1989. It was filed under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act ).

3. Under Section 28 of the Act, income mentioned therein is chargeable to income tax under the head "profits and gains of business or profession". Clause (iii)(b) in Section 28 was inserted by the Finance Act of 1990. Finance Bill which ultimately became the Finance Act received assent of the President of India on May 31, 1990. Clause (iii)(b) was given retrospective operation w.e.f. April 1, 1967. Clause (iii)(b) is as under :

"(iii)(b)-Cash assistance (by whatever named called) received or receivable by any person against exports under any scheme of the Government of India."

4. Before the insertion of clause (iii)(b), cash assistance received by any person against

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top