2000(3) Supreme 295
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Patna High Court)
V.N. Khare & Doraiswami Raju, JJ.
Edward Keventer Pvt. Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Bihar State Agricultural Marketing Board & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2503 of 1998
Decided on 11-4-2000
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Utpal Mazumdar, Raja Chatterjee, Mrs. Sarla Chandra, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Advocate, Irshad Ahmad, Rashid Saeed, Advocates.
Held : A perusal of Section 2(1)(a) unambiguously shows that the agricultural produce which are to be covered by the sweep of the Act necessarily has to be specified in the Schedule. If any agricultural produce is not specified in the Schedule, it goes beyond the purview of the Act and respondent has no power to levy fee on such produce. In the Schedule under caption fruits mango and apple have been specified as agricultural produce. We further find in the Schedule that under caption cereals wheat is specified at item No. 3, whereas wheat atta , sujji and maida which are the products of wheat are separately specified at item Nos. 14, 15 and 16, respectively. This shows that the agricultural produce wheat has been treated as a separate agricultural produce as compared to its own product manufactured out of wheat namely, atta , sujji and maida . Atta , sujji and maida are basically the agricultural products of wheat . Similarly, the Schedule shows that under the caption Animal Husbandry Product , milk excluding liquid milk is specified at item No. 19 whereas butter , ghee , cream , chena and khoya which are manufactured out of milk are separately specified at item Nos. 7, 8, 16, 17 and 19 respectively. Under caption miscellaneous , mango pickles is specified at item No. 18. Mango pickles is a product of mango, which is a fruit; and specified in Schedule but mango pickles have been specified separately. This shows basic ingredients may be the same but the end product which is known differently is treated as a separate item. It is true that Frooti and Appy are manufactured out of mango pulp and apple concentrate, but after the mango pulps and apple concentrate are processed the beverages are manufactured, the products become entirely different items and the fruits mango and apple loose their identity. In common parlance, these beverages are no longer known as mango and apple as fruits. In other words, after processing mango pulp and apple concentrate, although the basic character of the mango pulp and apple concentrate may be present in beverages, but the end products are not fruits i.e. mango and apple which are specified in the Schedule. The product Frooti and Appy not being specified in the Schedule, the respondent had no authority to demand any fee from the appellant on marketing the said products. (Paras 5 & 8)
JUDGMENT
V.N. Khare, J.-The appellant herein is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act and has its head office and factory outside the State of Bihar. The company manufactures fruit drinks and markets it under the brand name of Frooti and Appy in the State of Bihar through its agents. The Bihar Legislature has enacted an Act known as Bihar Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The object of the Act is to provide better regulation of buying and selling of agricultural produce and the arrangement of market for agricultural produce in the State of Bihar. Under Section 27 of the Act, the Market Committee set up under the Act has power to levy and collect market fee on the agricultural produce, which are specified in the Schedule and are bought or sold in the market area. It is not disputed that the entire district of Patna is declared as a market area. Section 2(1)(a) of the Act defines agricultural produce which runs as under:
" `Agricultural produce means all produce whether processed or non-processed, manufactured or not, of Agriculture, Horticulture, Plantation, animal Husbandry, Forest, Sericulture, Pisciculture, and includes livestock or poultry as specified in the Schedule."
2. Under Section 39 of the Act, the State Government by a notification is empowered to add, amend, or cancel any of the items of the agricultural produce in the Schedule as required by Section 2(1)(a) of the Act. In the Schedule, as contemplated under Section 2(1)(a), mango and apple are specified under the caption fruits as items No. 1 and 13 respectively. The respondents treating Frooti and Appy as mango and apple products, issued a notice dated 28.3.89, requiring the appellant to pay market fee on the products marketed under the brand name Frooti and Appy , failing which action under the Act would be taken. Under such circumstances, the appellant challenged the aforesaid demand by means of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. However, the said writ petition was dismissed and Letters Patent Appeal filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge was also dismissed. It is in this way the appellant is in appeal before us.
3. The short question that arises for consideration in this case is, whether the products which are ready to serve beverages under the brand name Frooti and Appy fall under the description of mango and apple, specified in the Schedule. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that, both the fruit drinks are not covered by the Schedule, whereas the contention of the respondents counsel is that the products being the mango and apple juices are covered under the item mango and apple , as specified in the Schedule.
4. The appellant has described the manufacturing process of beverages Frooti and Appy as under:
"Frooti and Appy are fruit drinks and manufacturing process of both are cumbersome. It is alleged that one of the ingredients of Frooti is mango pulp and not mango which is procured by the appellant company as raw material from outside agencies. Similarly, one of the ingredients of Appy is apple concentrate and not apple. The pulp is first passed through a filter and stored in beverage tank. Similarly sugar in proportionate quantity is processed in the form of syrup after heating it to a certain temperature and then cooling it. Demineralised water is then added to the sugar syrup to the extent that it attains a certain `brix content. Meanwhile in the beverage tank requisite amount of citric acid, non-alcoholic beverage base (NABB), other permitted additives, sodium citrate, vitamin C are added. Thereafter the sugar syrup and the mixture in the beverage tank are mixed in proportionate quantity. Thereafter the said mixture is passed through homogeniser and crushed at a very high pressure to disintegrate all the fibres, which are present in the beverage mixture. After homogenisation, the mixture is then required to be pas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.