SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 618

A.P.MISRA, R.C.LAHOTI
Kuldip Singh – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Chander Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.C. Lahoti, J.-Plaintiff/respondents No. 1 to 3 and defendant No. 1/appellant are neighbours having their properties in the city of Ludhiana. Sometime in the month of August, 1978, the appellant constructed a bhatti (backing oven) in his premises. He also moved an application to the Municipal Corporation of Ludhiana seeking grant of licence to run the bakery. The plaintiff raised a protest and then filed a suit seeking an injunction against the appellant restraining him from running/operating the bhatti, and also an injunction against the Municipal Corporation restraining it from issuing the licence sought for by the appellant. During the pendency of the suit the lincence under Section 342 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 was granted by the Municipal Corporation to the appellant. By its judgment and decree dated 3-3-1981 the Trial Court dismissed the suit against the Municipal Corporation forming an opinion that in as much as the licence had already been issued the prayer for the grant of preventive injunction in that regard was rendered infructuous, also that the Municipal Corporation could not be restrained by the Civil Court from exercising a statutory powe

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top