SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 832

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, R.P.SETHI, G.B.PATTANAIK
Gantusa H. Baddi – Appellant
Versus
Meerabai G. Pai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Pattanaik, J.-This appeal is directed against the revisional Order of a learned Single Judge of Karnataka High Court, dismissing the Revision Petition and affirming the order of eviction passed by the District Judge in his Revisional Jurisdiction under the provisions of Karnataka Rent Control Act. The legal representatives of the deceased tenant are the appellants. The landlord filed an application for eviction under Section 21(1)(a), (h) and (p) of the Act, alleging that the tenant has not paid or tendered the arrears of the rent legally recoverable from him and that the premises are reasonably and bona fide required by the landlord for occupation of himself as well as on the further assertion that the tenant has acquired vacant possession of an alternative suitable building. The Munsif at Yellapur, on consideration of the entire materials before him held against the landlord on all counts, and dismissed the application for eviction by his order dated 4.10.1991. The said order was assailed in revision under Section 50 of the Act. The Revisional Court came to the conclusion that the Munsiff had not properly appreciated the evidence on record. Though he did not set aside the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top