SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 139

M.B.SHAH, B.N.KIRPAL
P. V. Jose – Appellant
Versus
Kanickammal – Respondent


ORDER

The respondent had filed a suit for declaration of a title to a suit property and for possession thereof in the year 1970. Claim for the title of the property was directed against the step-brother. In the said suit the appellant herein, who was in occupation of the premises, had been impleaded as defendant No. 3. In the written statement filed by the appellant herein he supported the case of the respondent s step-brother and he denied the title of the respondent to the said property.

2. The trial Court decreed the suit and granted a decree for declaration and possession in favour of the respondent herein. Thereupon the step-brother of the respondent filed an appeal in the Court of the District Judge, Coimbatore who by his judgment dated 31st October, 1975 in Appeal Suit No. 21/74 upheld the decree of the trial Court. While disposing of the said appeal one of the contentions which was considered by the lower appellate court was the plea which had been raised by the appellant herein to the effect that he was entitled to the benefit under the provision of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Act ). This contention of the appellant herein was





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top