SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1127

B.N.KIRPAL, N.S.HEGDE
Designated Authority Anti Dumping Directorate Ministry Of Commerce – Appellant
Versus
Haldor Topsoe A/s – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Santosh Hegde, J.-Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 5361/2000.

2. The appellant in Civil Appeal No. 4109 of 2000 (arising out of SLP (C) No.5361/2000) had filed a petition before the Designated Authority (Anti-Dumping) Ministry of Commerce (for short the Authority ) alleging that M/s. Haldor Topsoe A/S (to be referred to as the respondent ) was indulging in "dumping" in India of six types of catalysts, particulars of which were enumerated in the said petition. Based on this petition, the Authority had initiated proceedings against the respondent under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1995 (for short the Tariff Act ).

3. The Authority, on 6th of September, 1996, issued a public notice of the anti dumping investigation to be conducted against the respondent for the export to India of the above-referred six catalysts from Denmark. The Authority also heard the parties concerned including the respondent and on 7.5.1997 published a preliminary finding holding that the export of the said catalysts amounted to dumping and proposed provisional imposition of anti-dumping duties against the respondent. The said determination of the Authority was accepted by the Governme














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top