SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1448

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, DORAISWAMY RAJU
Mallikarjuna Mudhagal Nagappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

The maximum intake of the institution is 30 student per section. The institution has two sections. The maximum number that can be admitted is 60. The petitioners before us are the extra 15 students who were admitted, the total being 75 students. In the High Court, the students and the institution had filed a joint writ petition and failed. Hence the 15 students also have filed the SLP.

2. We are not impressed by the fact that the students are before us challenging the orders of the department that they cannot be permitted to take the examination. If their admission was not valid and was beyond the permitted quota of 60, we cannot help the petitioners.

3. Learned Single Judge and the Division Bench were absolutely right in applying the decision of this Court in State of Punjab v. Renuka Singla1 and State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale2 and in declaring that this admission was illegal. The relevant passages of the above said judgment is as follows :-

State of Punjab v. Renuka Singla (supra) :

"The admission in Medical Course throughout India is governed by different statutory provisions including regulations framed under different Acts. During last several years efforts h






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top