SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 76

N.S.HEGDE, S.P.BHARUCHA, R.C.LAHOTI
Trade Tax Officer, Gorakhpur, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Roadways India – Respondent


ORDER

These writ petitions ought not to have been entertained by the High Court. Questions of facts were obviously involved as to the manner in which the motor vehicles were used. The writ petition was not the appropriate means of dealing with the issue. The civil appeals are allowed. The orders under appeal are set aside. The writ petitions are dismissed.

2. It shall be open to the parties to take all available contentions in the assessment proceedings.

3. No order as to costs.

(C.R.) Appeals allowed.

**************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top