SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 48

S.B.MAJMUDAR, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Archana Singh – Appellant
Versus
Alok Pratap Singh – Respondent


ORDER

We have seen the counter affidavit sent by the respondent. No one appears today on his behalf to contest these proceedings.

2. In our view offer to pay the travelling expenses to the petitioner wife is not a substitute for the difficulties which she will have to undertake for contesting the case at Thane all the way from Patna especially when she has a small child to look after. She wants the case to be transferred to Varanasi which is the permanent place of residence of the respondent s parents.

3. In our view, there will be sufficient hardship for her to travel all the way to Thane. Only on this short ground, this Transfer Petition is allowed. The Divorce Petition being titled Alok Pratap Singh v. Archana Singh1 pending in the file of 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane will stand transferred to the District Court, Varanasi.

4. The learned District Judge, Varanasi may try the petition himself or may transfer it to any other competent court for its trial.

5. No costs.

(C.R.) Order accordingly.

**************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top