SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 137

K.T.THOMAS, D.P.WADHWA, S.S.M.QUADRI
K. C. Mathew And Sons – Appellant
Versus
A. Sulaikha Beevi – Respondent


ORDER

First appellant is a firm which claims a right under Section 106 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act in respect of the suit property when the first respondent-plaintiff filed a petition for eviction of the appellants under certain Sections of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The Rent Control Court felt that the contention raised by the tenant claiming permanent tenancy requires to be considered in a regular civil suit. Thereupon parties were directed to approach the civil court. Pursuant to the said direction first respondent filed the suit for eviction under Section 11(3) and 11(4)(i) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. As the appellants, in their written statement raised a claim of permanent tenancy based on Section 106 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, the question was referred to a Land Tribunal as required under Section 125(3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. The Land Tribunal decided the question in favour of the appellant and sent the records back to the civil court. Subsequently civil court dismissed the suit filed by the first respondent.

2. The matter was taken up before the First Appellate Court at the instance of the first respondent















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top