SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 595

M.B.SHAH, K.T.THOMAS
Abdul Hamit Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. We know that this is a case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 149. Though the police was not able to trace out the culprits at the first stage of the investigation, pursuant to the petition filed by the widow of the deceased further investigation was conducted and the names of the present Appellants are also now included among the suspected persons. We came across the antecedents of the deceased which Appellants described as dreaded . None the less, we are not inclined to give a pre-arrest bail order to the Appellants. At the same time considering all the pros and cons of this matter we are of the view that some relief must be granted to the Appellants in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. We, therefore, dispose of this appeal with the following directions:

(1) If Appellants would surrender before the police within 2 weeks from today, we direct the investigating officer to complete the interrogation of the Appellant concerned as expeditiously as possible. On completion of interrogation are recovery of material object, if any, such Appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond i



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top