SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 877

G.B.PATTANAIK, S.N.VARIAVA
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Narayan Dandalwar – Respondent


ORDER

This appeal is directed against an order of acquittal recorded by the High Court of Bombay acquitting the accused-Respondent of his conviction under Section 498-A of the IPC.

2. The accused stood charged under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC and the learned trial Judge acquitted him of the charge under Section 306 IPC, but convicted under Section 498-A IPC. On an appeal being carried, the High Court examined the entire material on record and came to the conclusion that there is not an iota of material on the basis of which the cruelty which is the necessary ingredient for bringing home the charge under Section 498-A IPC can be said to have been established and accordingly acquitted him.

3. Mr. Deshpande, appearing for the State vehemently contended that the oral evidence read with the letters supposed to have been written by the deceased to her brother as well as other persons unequivocally indicates the treatment that was meted out to her by the accused and therefore, the order of acquittal is wholly unjustified. But, having gone through the letters produced by the prosecution, we do not find even a slightest assertion in any of the letters complaining against the husband either he



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top