SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 238

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
Om Prakash Chugh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. An incident happened on 2nd July, 1997 about which there appears to be two rival versions. One version had come in the form of F.I.R. No. 452 of 1997, Police State - City Sonepat (Haryana). We are told that investigation in that case is continuing. Appellant is the father of one Vinod who died in the incident which happened on 2.7.1997. Appellant filed a complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sonepat on 10.7.1997 alleging that his son was shot dead by the persons shown as accused therein. After narrating his own version of the incident appellant made a prayer at the final end that action under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code ) may be resorted to. Additionally, he prayed that investigation may be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigating (CBI) or any other investigation agency which is totally independent of the local police. An order was passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate on 18.3.1998 directing the C.B.I. to conduct investigation into allegations set out in the said complaint.

3. In the meanwhile appellant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code before the High Court of Punj








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top