SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 240

B.N.KIRPAL, M.B.SHAH, R.C.LAHOTI
Whirlpool Of India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Incometax, New Delhi – Respondent


ORDER

The question involved in this reference relates to the allowability of the deduction of Rs. 1,40,86,821/- claimed by the appellant for the assessment year 1986-87 under Section 43-B of the Income Tax Act.

2. The Income Tax Officer had disallowed this deduction for the year 1986-87 but had allowed it for the subsequent assessment year 1987-88. Similarly in respect of assessment year 1987-88, the Income Tax Officer had disallowed another amount of Rs.1,25,30,853/- claimed under Section 43-B but in appeal the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed this deduction. The effect of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is that in respect of the assessment year 1987-88 the appellant has got a deduction of Rs. 1,40,86,821, which was allowed by the Income Tax Officer, plus further deduction of Rs. 1,25,30,853/- as a result of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

3. In view of the decision of this Court in Allied Motors Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax1 in respect of the amount of Rs. 1,40,86,821/- the deduction was allowable for the assessment year 1986-87, as claimed by the appellant before the Income Tax Officer. In this view of the matter the question




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top