R.P.SETHI, G.B.PATTANAIK
Kishori Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. These three Appellants though were named as accused in the FIR, but had not been chargesheeted when the police, after investigation filed the chargesheet under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The offence in question is one which was triable by a Court of Sessions. The Magistrate by an order dated 10.6.1997 came to the conclusion that there appears sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused persons and as such cognizance be taken under Sections 302/34, 324 and 448 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The expression "accused persons" would obviously mean those accused persons against whom the police had filed the chargesheet. Later, on the prayer of the prosecution, the Magistrate passed an order on 22.10.1997 issuing non-bailable warrants of arrest against these (the present Appellants), who had not been chargesheeted by the police while filing the papers under Section 173 of Cr.P.C. though named as accused in the FIR. These Appellants then moved the learned Sessions Judge in Revision who came to the conclusion that the order of the Magistrate is without jurisdiction and allowed the Revision.
4. The matter having been carried in appeal, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.