SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 980

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, M.B.SHAH
Hara Parbati Cold Storage Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Uco Bank – Respondent


ORDER

Special leave granted.

2. The suit by the respondent Bank is of the year 1984. It was filed in the Court of the 1st Assistant District Judge and was transferred to the Original Side of the High Court in 1987 under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. In a recent judgment in Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank & Anr.1 this Court has observed that all suits from civil courts shall stand transferred to the Debts Recovery Tribunal constituted under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. This transfer under Section 31 of the Act is automatic, and the Registrar of the High Court, where the suit is pending, is only to perform the ministerial act of transferring the papers to the Tribunal. But unfortunately, the learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court, Amitav Lala, J. held that this suit was transferred to the High Court earlier on the Judicial Side, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Registrar could not have therefore directed the file to be sent to the Tribunal. This view was reversed by the Division Bench which held that the transfer was automatic.

4. The fact that the suit was originally filed in the Assistant District




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top