SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1021

2000(7) Supreme 377
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T. Thomas & R.P. Sethi, JJ.
Shantilal & etc. -Appellant
versus
Vimalchand & Ors. -Respondents
Criminal Appeal Nos. 455-461 of 2000
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 70-76 of 1999)
With
Criminal Appeal Nos. 462-468 of 2000
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2258-2264 of 1999)
Decided on 9-5-2000

Headnote:Investigation-Impugned order set aside to facilitate investigation in view of decision in Rajesh Bajaj case-Accused however ordered to be released on bail if they were required to be arrested-Investigating Officer to take samples of any article suspected to be contraband to avoidthe possibility of seizing whole goods-Order not to prejudice civil rights of both parties. (Paras 2 to 4)

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. We heard both sides.

In view of decision of this Court in Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.1 we set aside the impugned order with a view to facilitate investigation to be completed. The investigation agency can proceed with the investigation of the case and reach a final conclusion on their own, either way. If the persons shown as accused in the FIR are to be arrested in the meanwhile we direct that those persons shall be released on bail on executing a self bond for such sum as the arresting officer may deem fit.

If the investigation reaches the conclusion that a final report under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code has to be laid against the respondents, we permit the respondents to raise all their contentions for a discharge at the appropriate stage.

Respondents as well as the appellants would render all assistance to the investigating officer to complete the investigation as expeditiously as possible.

3. Investigating officer is permitted to take samples of any article which he suspect to be contraband. This is observed for the purpose of avoiding the possibility of seizing the whole goods during the investigation stage.

4. This order will be without prejudice to the contentions of respondents that no offence has been committed and also of the contentions of the appellants that offence has been committed.

5. We make it clear that this order will not prejudice the civil rights of both parties in respect of the case involved.

These appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Appeals disposed of accordingly.

****************

Parallel Citations of other Journals :

Shantilal & etc. v. Vimalchand & Ors., 2000(7) Supreme 377

00030

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top