SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 46

2000(7) Supreme 565
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.P. Bharucha, V.N. Khare and S.S. Mohammed Quadri, JJ.
Keya Ankan Saha -Appellant
versus
Ankan K. Saha -Respondent
Transfer Petition (C) No. 222 of 1999
Decided on 10-1-2000

Headnote:Civil Procedure Code, 1908-Section 25-Divorce petition filed by husband in Bombay Court-Transfer petition by wife who was staying at Alipore, Calcutta with her three year old son with her maternal uncle-She did not have any income source and her father was old-Transfer petition deserved to be allowed and divorce petition ordered to be transfered to District Judge, Alipore.

       

ORDER

This is a transfer petition filed by the wife for transfer of a divorce petition filed by the respondent-husband in the court of the Civil Judge, Thane, Bombay. It is the case of the wife that she is staying with her three-year old son at Alipore, Calcutta with her maternal uncle. She is without an independent source of income so that she cannot spend on travelling up and down to defend the divorce proceeding in Bombay nor in there any place for her to stay there. Her father is old and cannot afford to accompany her. It is also pointed out that she had filed maintenance proceedings in Alipore which were contested by the respondent-husband. It is contended on behalf of the husband that he is working while she is not and that she can contact the appropriate legal aid cell to defend her in Bombay. The submission overlooks the fact that she would have to go to Bombay to give instructions and to give evidence.

2. We think that, it the circumstances, the transfer petition should be allowed. Marriage Petition No. A-189 of 1998 pending in the court of the Civil Judge, Thane, Bombay shall stand transferred to the court of the District Judge, Alipore, Calcutta, who may decide the same himself or assign it for trial to an another competent court.

3. No order as to costs.

Petition allowed.

***************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top