M.B.SHAH, K.T.THOMAS
Vivek Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Y. R. Patil – Respondent
ORDER
Leave granted.
2. There is no reason to quash the prosecution at this stage because the imputations are per as defamatory. It is for the accused concerned to show that they are protected by one of the exceptions in Section 499 of IPC as publication is also undisputed.
3. However, we do not think it necessary to retain accused Nos. 2 and 3 in the array of the accused as their connection with the publication is too remote even on the averments made in the complaint. Hence, we order them to be deleted from the party array. Accused Nos. 1 and 4 in the complaint will be reranked as accused Nos. 1 and 2 and would be proceeded against. It is open to those accused to apply for exemption from personal appearance and on such application being made the trial Court shall exempt them personal from appearance on the following conditions :
1. A counsel on their behalf would be present in the court whenever their case is taken up.
2. They will not dispute their identity as the accused in the case.
3. They will be present in court when such presence is imperatively needed.
With these directions the appeal is disposed of.
Appeal disposed of.
****************
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.