SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 208

A.P.MISRA, N.S.HEGDE, S.P.BHARUCHA
Additional Collector Of Central Excise Bombay Ll – Appellant
Versus
Mahindra And Mahindra LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Civil Appeal No. 2206 of 1999 :

This is an appeal against an order of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Tribunal. The Tribunal followed the judgment of this Court in Philips India Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Pune1 in coming to its conclusion.

2. We find that, on another point, this matter is covered against the appellant by the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in Collector of Central Excise, Baroda v. Cotspun Limited2. Therefore, we do not go into the merits of the Tribunal s judgment.

3. The show cause notice in this case was issued on 4th November, 1988 for the period October, 1983 to August, 1987. The clearances in question during this period had been made on the basis of approved price lists. The judgment in Cotspun Limited holds :

"14. The levy of excise duty on the basis of an approved classification list is the correct levy, at least until such time as to the correctness of the approval is questioned by the issuance to the assessee of a show-cause notice. It is only when the correctness of the approval is challenged that an approved classification list ceases to be such.

15. The levy of excise duty on the basis of an approved classification list








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top