SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1925

S.P.BHARUCHA, RUMA PAL, DORAISWAMY RAJU
K. Ravindranathan Nair – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Incometax, Emakulam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Bharucha, J.-We are concerned in these appeals, from a decision of a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala, with the Assessment Year 1972-73, the previous year of which ended for the assessee on 30th September, 1971. The question that was referred to the High Court and which it answered in the negative and against the assessee reads thus:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to claim deduction of Rs. 4,18,107/- under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act?"

2. The assessee, an individual, carried on the business of processing cashew nuts in ten units. Four of these units were situated in Kerala. Of these four units, two were owned by the assessee and two were taken on lease. In October, 1969, the assessee faced labour problems in Kerala, consequent upon which he ordered a lock-out of the four units there. On 9th March, 1970, the assessee leased out the two units which he owned in Kerala to a private limited company whose only two shareholders were the assessee and his wife. The agreement in this behalf provided that the workmen employed in the two units would have continuity of service. At about the same time the lessee surr












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top