SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 2010

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, R.P.SETHI, D.P.MOHAPATRA
Ram Lakhan – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent


ORDER

These applications have been filed by the respondent No. 2 M/s. Swatantra Bharat Mills for recalling the order dated 17.11.1999 in which the Civil Appeal Nos. 6566-68/991 were allowed and for rehearing of the cases on merits.

2. In the applications it was stated, inter alia, that on 17.11.1999 the advocate-on-record for respondent No. 2, Shri B.R. Sabharwal left the Court premises on account of ill-health requesting Mr. Harvinder Singh, Advocate to inform the Court if the matter reached for hearing, but before the case was called Shri Harvinder Singh, Advocate also left the Court premises on receiving a call from his house that his son needed immediate medical attention. In these circumstances, contended the applicant, absence of its lawyers when the appeal was heard, was in the circumstances and for reasons beyond its control.

3. Considering the averments made in the application particularly the ground of illness of the advocate-on-record and illness of the son of the other advocate whom he had requested to make a mention before the Court when the case was called, we decided to give an opportunity to the counsel for the applicant to place the case on merits making it clear that







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top