SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 341

R.P.SETHI, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Karnta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The appellants writ petition was disposed of by the learned Single Judge of the High Court with the observations that since the writ petition involved disputed question of title, the appellants may approach the Civil Court for appropriate relief. Unfortunately, the appellants filed an LPA against the judgment of the Single Judge. The learned Judges dismissed the LPA with a positive finding on the question of title which, in the circumstances of the case, could not have been recorded unless full evidence was brought on record.

3. Consequently, we allow this appeal at the initial stage, as the respondents are represented before us and we have heard their counsel. The order passed by the Division Bench is set aside and the appellants are directed to seek their remedy in the Civil Court in respect of the property in question, if they are so advised.

Appeal allowed.

***************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top