SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 2003

D.P.MOHAPATRA, K.T.THOMAS
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kowthalam Chinna Narasimhulu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-Seven accused persons were charged under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. Two of them, accused No. 2-Mahanandi and accused No. 3 - Eranna were acquitted by the Trial Court and the rest i.e. accused No. 1-Kowthalam Chinna Narasimhulu @ Donga Ramudu, accused No. 4 - Dadapeer, accused No. 5 - Mohidin Peeran, accused No. 6 - Khaja Hussain and accused No. 7-Chand Basha were found guilty of the offences charged and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years for the offence punishable under Section 148 IPC and to suffer life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. The trial Court further held that both the sentences were to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved by the judgment of the trial Court, both, the convicted accused and the State of Andhra Pradesh filed appeals before the High Court. The High Court by the judgment dated 3.9.1990 allowed the appeal filed by the convicted accused and dismissed the appeal filed by the State. Therefore, the State of Andhra Pradesh has filed these appeals against all the seven accused persons.

3. The prosecution case, as unfolded by the eye-witnesse
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top