SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1931

D.P.MOHAPATRA, S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
K. Govindan And Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Incometax, Cochin – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.P. Mohapatra, J.-The question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether in an assessment made under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act ) it is open to the assessing authority to charge interest for default in filing return under Section 139(8) of the Act? For answering this question it is necessary to determine what is a regular assessment for the purpose of Section 139(8) of the Act.

2. Shorn of unnecessary details the facts leading to the present proceeding may be stated thus :

For the assessment year 1984-85 the assessee, appellant herein, filed a return of income in response to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Act. While completing the assessment the assessing authority charged interest under Section 139(8) and also under Section 217 of the Act. In the appeal filed by the assessee before the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) it was contended that the assessment in the case was not a regular assessment within the meaning of Section 2(40) of the Act and, therefore, no interest could be charged under Section 139(8) of the Act. The contention did not find favour with the appellate authority so far as the interest charge













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top