SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 196

2001(2) Supreme 22
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Punjab and Haryana High Court)
S. Rajendra Babu & K.G. Balakrishnan, JJ.
O.P. Lather & Ors. etc. -Appellants
versus
Satish Kumar Kakkar & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 1012-1013 of 2001
(Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 4341-42 of 2000)
With
Civil Appeal No. 1014 of 2001
(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 10704 of 2000)
Decided on 2-2-2001
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : P.P. Rao, P.K. Palli, Sr. Advocates, Raj Kumar Gupta, Mritunjay, Kumar Singh, A.N. Bardiyar, Neeraj Jain, Mahabir Singh, Anant V. Palli, Atul Sharma and Mrs. Rekha Palli, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Clarificatory order, equating diploma awarded by State Board of Technical Education with diploma awarded by recognised university, issued by Government to Services Rules framed under Proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution cannot be treated as amending or altering Service Rules so to hold it not valid.

Headnote:(i) Service Law-Promotion-Executive Engineer-Prescribed qualification in terms of Rules framed under proviso to Article 309 of Constitution was diploma in Civil Engineering awarded by recognised university-Diploma awarded by State Board of Technical Education-Universities not awarding diploma-Government s clarificatory order treating Diploma awarded by State Board as equivalent to diploma awarded by recognised university-Government order valid it being supplemental to Rules already framed-It does not have effect of altering Rules nor inconsistent therewith-No vested right of any person taken away by clarificatory order-Nothing wrong in giving retrospective effect to clarificatory order-Haryana Inspectorate (Group A) Service Rules, 1997. (Paras 7 to 15)

       (ii) Constitution of India-Article 309-Rules regulating recruitment-Haryana Electrical Inspectorate (Group-A) Service Rules 1997-Clarificatory order of State Government that Diploma awarded by State Board of Technical Education is equivalent to Diploma awarded by recognised university-Supplemental to Rules-Does not have effect of altering Rules nor inconsistent therewith-Clarificatory order valid. (Paras 7 to 11)

       

JUDGMENT

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.-Leave granted.

2. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No. 9655 of 1999 and C.W.P. No. 15317 of 1999, the present appeals are filed by the party respondents and the State of Haryana respectively. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench held that the contesting party respondents (appellants in the civil appeals arising from SLP (Civil) Nos. 4341-42 of 2000) were not entitled to be promoted as Executive Engineers and that the claim of the petitioner in the writ petitions shall be considered.

3. Initially, Satish Kumar Kakkar, the first respondent in these appeals, filed a writ petition (C.W.P. No. 9655 of 1999) claiming that he alone was entitled to be promoted as Executive Engineer and contended that the third respondent therein, namely, O.P. Lather, then working as Asstt. Engineer, lacked the requisite educational qualification for promotion as Executive Engineer. The Division Bench held that the said third respondent did not have the requisite qualification for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer and directed that the post of Executive Engineer be filled up in accordance with the Rules. Subsequent to this judgment, the Govt. of Haryana issued an executive order on 7th October, 1999 whereby it was clarified that the Three Years Diploma in Electrical Engineering, awarded by the State Board of Technical Education, Haryana, would be treated as equivalent to Diploma in Electrical Engineering from a recognised university. Consequently, the appellants herein, namely, O.P. Lather, P.D. Sharma and Daya Nand were promoted to the posts of Executive Engineer by proceedings dated 26th October, 1999. The order passed by the Govt. of Haryana on 26th October, 1999, was challenged by Satish Kumar Kakkar in a writ petition (C.W.P. No. 15317 of 1999) contending that none of them possessed the requisite qualification for being promoted as Executive Engineer and the Division Bench of the High Court accepted his contention and quashed the promotions. The Division Bench also directed to consider the claim of the first respondent herein for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer. Judgments in these two writ petitions are challenged before us.

4. As per Rules framed by the State of Haryana under Proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the post of Executive Engineer would be filled up by direct recruitment as well as by promotion. The relevant portion of the "Haryana Electrical Inspectorate (Group-A) Service Rules, 1997" is column 3 of Appendix B of the said Rules. The same is to the following effect :

S.No.

Designation of posts

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for direct recruitment

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for appointment other than by direct recruitment

S.No.

Designation of posts

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for direct recruitment

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for appointment other than by direct recruitment

2. Executive Engineer

1. Degree in Electrical Engineering from a recognised University or its equivalent.

 

 

2. Should have been regularly engaged for a period of at least eight years in the practice of electrical engineering of which not less than two years should have been spent in an electrical or mechanical engineering workshop or in generation, transmission or distribution of electricity or in the administration of Indian Electricity Act, 1910, and the Rules made thereunder in a position of responsibility.

1. Degree or Diploma in Electrical Engineering from a recognised University or its equivalent.

(emphasis supplied)

 

2. Eight years experience as Asstt. Engineer.

S.No.

Designation of posts

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for direct recruitment

Academic qualifications and experience, if any, for appointment other than by direct recruitment

2. Executive Engineer

1. Degree in Electrical Engineering from a recognised Universi























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top