SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 196

S.RAJENDRA BABU, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
O. P. Lather – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Kakkar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.-Leave granted.

2. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No. 9655 of 1999 and C.W.P. No. 15317 of 1999, the present appeals are filed by the party respondents and the State of Haryana respectively. By the impugned judgment, the Division Bench held that the contesting party respondents (appellants in the civil appeals arising from SLP (Civil) Nos. 4341-42 of 2000) were not entitled to be promoted as Executive Engineers and that the claim of the petitioner in the writ petitions shall be considered.

3. Initially, Satish Kumar Kakkar, the first respondent in these appeals, filed a writ petition (C.W.P. No. 9655 of 1999) claiming that he alone was entitled to be promoted as Executive Engineer and contended that the third respondent therein, namely, O.P. Lather, then working as Asstt. Engineer, lacked the requisite educational qualification for promotion as Executive Engineer. The Division Bench held that the said third respondent did not have the requisite qualification for promotion to the post of Executive Engineer and directed that the post of Executive Engineer be filled up in accordance wi















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top