2001(2) Supreme 289
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Designated Court at Pune)
K.T. Thomas & D.P. Mohapatra, JJ.
Suresh @ Pappu Bhudharmal Kalani etc. -Appellants
versus
The State of Maharashtra -Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1298-1299 of 1998
With
Criminal Appeal Nos. 66-67/1999 and Criminal Appeal Nos. 314-15 of 1999
Decided on 2-3-2001
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : V.S. Kotwal, Sr. Advocate, A.M. Khanwilkar, Shrikant Shinde, Chinmoy A. Khalandkar, Girish Kulkarni, Mrs. V.D. Khanna, G.B. Sathe and D.M. Nargolkar, Advocates.
Held : We have carefully perused the order of the Special Judge, which is under challenge and other relevant documents. We are not satisfied that the order passed by the Special Judge suffers from any jurisdictional error in the approach to the case or in sifting of the materials for the purpose of ascertaining whether a prima facie case under Sections 3 and 5 of the TADA (P) Act is made out against the appellant and in arriving at the conclusions as expressed in the order. (Para 24)
Section 18 of the TADA (P) Act provides that where, after taking cognizance of any offence, a Designated Court is of opinion that the offence is not triable by it, it shall, notwithstanding that it has no jurisdiction to try such offence, transfer the case for the trial of such offence to any court having jurisdiction under the Code. In this case the learned special Judge has recorded the finding that a prima facie case under section 5 of the TADA (P) Act has been made out. Therefore the petition filed by the accused under section 18 of the TADA (P) Act was rightly rejected. The finding recorded by the learned special judge holding that on the materials placed by thee prosecution a prima facie case under section 3 of the TADA (P) Act is not made out also does not suffer from any serious illegality. In the circumstances the judgment/order passed by the learned special judge does not warrant any interference. Accordingly, the appeals, being devoid of merits, are dismissed. Hearing of the cases be expedited. The records be returned forthwith. (Para 25)
JUDGMENT
D.P. Mohapatra, J.-In these three sets of appeals the judgment/order passed by the Designated Court of Thane at Pune on 10th November, 1998 in T.S.C. No.25/92 and 9/93 has been challenged. Criminal Appeal NOS. 1298-99/98 and Criminal Appeal Nos. 66-67/99 have been filed by the accused persons against rejection of the petition filed by them under section 18 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 [for short the TADA (P) Act ]. Criminal Appeal Nos. 572-573/1999 have been filed by the State of Maharashtra against finding recorded by the Special Court that on the materials placed on record by the prosecution no charge can be framed under section 3 of the TADA (P) Act.
2. Since the incidents giving rise to the criminal cases are the same and the appeals are directed against the same judgment/order for the sake of convenience we will state the facts and deal with the case in Criminal Appeal Nos.1298-99/ 1998 in detail.
3. In this appeal filed under section 19 of the TADA (P) Act, accused no.4 (Suresh @ Pappu Bhudharmal Kalani) of T.S.C.No.25/1992, has challenged the order passed by the Designated Court of Thane rejecting the application filed by him under section 18 of the Act for discharging him from the charges under sections 3 and 5 of the TADA (P) Act and to transfer the case to the Sessions Court on the ground, inter alia. that no case under section 3 or section 5 of the TADA (P) Act is made out against him.
4. The prosecution case, shortly stated, is as under:-
One Dunichand Kalani, who was the President of Ulhasnagar Taluka Congress, used to make complaints against one Gopal Rajwani and his political supporters about their criminal activities. On 9th of April 1989 at about 9.00 p.m. the said Dunichand Kalani was murdered on a public road by 10-12 persons armed with weapons like knives, gupties, revolvers, etc. On the FIR lodged by one Narayan Budharmal Kalani at Ulhasnagar Police Station a case under sections 302, 147,148,149 of the Indian Penal Code and section 25 of the Arms Act was registered against Gopal Rajwani and some others. In the said case the provisions of TADA (P) Act was involved and it was registered as C.R.No.T-296/89 under section 3 of the TADA (P) Act and under sections 147,148,149 and 120B, 302 of IPC and section 25 of the Arms Act. After investigation charge-sheet was filed in the case against 23 persons. The appellant is the nephew of deceased Dunichand Kalani. Both Gop Beharani as well as the accused no.4 were elected as Municipal Councillors and a dispute arose between them on account of claim over Presidentship of the Ulhasnagar Municipal Council. On this account, it is alleged, that there was enmity between Gop Beharani and accused No. 4.
5. On 10.7.1992 while the deceased Maruti Dagadu Jadhav was sitting in his office at about 8.15 p.m. and chit-chatting with one Arun Kaklij, one white coloured Maruti van No.MH-12-1042 came near his office and three persons alighted from the same and rushed inside the office. Those three persons fired bullets at Maruti Dagadu Jhadav from the revolver held by them. In the incident Arun Kaklij was also injured. After the incident the assailants escaped in the Maruti van. The FIR was recorded by PSI of the Vithalwadi Police Station on the dying declaration made by Maruti Dagadu Jadhav in which he gave the description of three assailants. The motive for the murder was ascribed to previous enmity. Thereafter Maruti Degadu Jadhav was admitted in the nursing home for treatment. At about 10.35 p.m. on the same day i.e. 10th July , 1992, he succumbed to the injuries. Thereafter the case registered under sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 IPC and section 25(1 )(A) of the Arms Act was changed from section 307 to section 302 IPC. On 20th July 1992 the provisions of section 5 of the TADA (P) Act was invoked in the case. In course of investigation it came to light that there was long standing enmity between Gopal Rajwani and Pappu Kalani, and the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.