SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 490

2001(2) Supreme 369
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(Under Art. 32 of the Constitution of India)
S. Rajendra Babu & S.N. Phukan, JJ.
S.S. Ahluwalia -Petitioner
versus
Union of India & Ors. -Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 232 of 1997
Decided on 16-3-2001
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Solicitor General, Vijay Panjwani, Y.P. Mahajan, Hemant Sharma, P. Parmeswaran, Kailash Vasdev, S. Verma, Mrs. H. Wahi, Ms. Anu Sawhney, Ms. Madhur Dadlani, S.K. Agnihotri, Ms. Binu Tamta, D.S. Mehra, Rajiv Mehta, Ms. Ameeta V. Duggal, T. Sridharan, S.S. Shinde, S.V. Deshpande, R.C. Verma, C. Sidharth, Brijender Chahar, Ashok Mathur, Ms. A. Subhashini, H.S. Parihar, K.S. Parihar, Anil Srivastava, B.B. Singh, K.R. Nagaraja, K.S. Bhati, R.S. Jena, J.S. Attri, R.S. Sodhi, Ashol K. Srivastava, Rajiv Mehta, Prem Nath Malhotra, K.H. Nobin Singh Ms. Malini Poduval, D.M. Nargolkar, Advocates.

VERY IMPORTANT POINT
The State is liable to pay compensation to the family of the sikhs killed during riots in the wake of assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984 as his or her life has been extinguished in clear violation of Article 21 of the Constitution. Delhi High Court directed payment of a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest in Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Administration. Based on it certain claims are made in writ petition under Article 32 to Supreme Court. They are transferred to respective High Courts for verification of claims and detailed examination of the circumstances arising in each case.

Headnote:Constitution of India-Articles 21 and 32-Killing of Sikhs in Delhi and other parts of country between October 31, 1984 and Nov. 1984 in the wake of assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi on Oct. 31, 1984-High Court of Delhi holding it as violation of Article 21 and held State was liable to pay compensation of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest in Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Admn. and made it applicable to similar case-Petition under Article 32 to Supreme Court for its enforcement-Certain claims made-Ordered to be verified by High Courts of concerned States so transferred the matter and directed to examine the circumstances arising in each case in its jurisdiction and extend the benefit of Delhi High Court s decision in above case accordingly.

       

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, J.-In the wake of assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984 there were several killings of Sikhs in Delhi and other parts of the country between October 31, 1984 till November 1984 which involved arson, looting and murder. A Committee was constituted headed by Justice R.N. Misra of this Court which made an inquiry and reported that Sikhs killed in those riots were 3874 in Delhi, 127 in Kanpur and 69 in Bokaro. Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Administration1 was filed in the High Court of Delhi for paying compensation to the dependents of those killed in the riots after the assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi as the State had a duty to protect the life of its citizens and the State ought to pay compensation thereof. The High Court of Delhi by its order dated July 5, 1996 held that in the expanded meaning attributed to Article 21 of the Constitution it is the duty of the State to create a climate where members of the society belonging to different faiths, caste and creed live together and, therefore, the State has a duty to protect their life, liberty, dignity and worth of an individual which should not be jeopardised or endangered. If in any circumstance the State is not able to do so, then it cannot escape the liability to pay compensation to the family of the person killed during riots as his or her life has been extinguished in clear violation of Article 21 of the Constitution. The High Court, therefore, directed payment of a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest and also made a general direction that this direction should apply to similar cases also. Thereafter, this writ petition has been filed seeking to extend the benefit of the judgment in Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Administration (supra) to the entire country and for certain other reliefs. It is brought to our notice that the number of persons killed in each of the States is as under :

Nos. Killed State

3874 Delhi

1 Rajasthan

3 Orissa

106 Haryana

2 Himachal Pradesh

120 Bihar

98 M.P.

260 Uttar Pradesh

9 Maharashtra

4473

Certain amounts have been paid to some of the dependents of those killed.

2. Certain claims have been made in para 13.3 of this writ petition setting out certain facts which need to be verified. After this petition was filed notices were issued to the Governments of different States and they have filed responses in each one of those cases stating the steps that have been taken by them in cases where there had been death or other kinds of violence resulting in injuries or loss of property. But in the nature of the circumstances of the case, it is very difficult for us to extend the decision of the High Court of Delhi in Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Administration (supra) to all the States without making a detailed examination of the circumstances arising in each case. Such examination cannot be done by us. Therefore, it would be appropriate for us to direct the High Courts of Delhi, Rajasthan, Orissa, Punjab & Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Patna, Madhya Pradesh, Allahabad, and Bombay in the States of Delhi, Rajasthan, Orissa, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar of Article 21 of the Constitution. Delhi High Court directed payment of a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs with interest in Bhajan Kaur v. Delhi Administration. Based on it certain claims are made in writ petition under Article 32 to Supreme Court. They are transferred to respective High Courts for verification of claims and detailed examination of the circumstances arising in each case.

JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, J.-In the wake of assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi on October 31, 1984 there were several killings of Sikhs in Delhi and other parts of the country between October 31,

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top