SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 553

S.P.BHARUCHA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Superintendent Of Central Excise – Appellant
Versus
Somabhai Ranchhodhbhai Patel – Respondent


ORDER

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.-The circumstances under which an order was passed by this Court on 25th August, 2000 directing that notice be issued on contempt petitions, in brief, are these:

On 31st December, 1997, Civil Judge (SD), Anand passed a decree in favour of respondent, inter alia, for Rs. 9,33,378.37p. with interest @ 6% from the date of the suit, i.e., from 16th March, 1982 and cost of the suit. The said decree is the subject matter of challenge in First Appeal No.2317/98 filed by the defendants (petitioners in SLP and contempt petition) in the High Court of Gujarat. A civil application was filed by the petitioners in the High Court seeking stay of the execution of the decree. The High Court by order dated 21st December, 1999 granted stay of the execution of the decree subject to the condition that decretal amount together with costs and interest is deposited in the trial Court within the period stipulated in the order. The High Court further directed that on deposit being made, the respondent who is the original plaintiff shall be entitled to withdraw 50% of the amount on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the trial Court and 50% without security.

2. The order dated 21s


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top