D.P.MOHAPATRA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Shaw Wallace And Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Govindas Purushothamdas – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.P. Mohapatra, J.-Leave granted.
2. Whether the revisional order dated 24th December, 1999 passed by the High Court of Madras in C.R.P.No.2317 of 1996 suffers from any serious illegality which warrants interference by this Court is the question for determination in this case. M/s. Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd., the tenant in occupation of the premises, has filed this appeal assailing the aforementioned order of the High Court.
3. The proceeding was initiated on the application filed by the landlords - Shri Govindas Purushothamdas and Shri Girdhari Govindas, respondents herein, for fixation of fair rent of the premises under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The controversy in the present proceeding relates to inclusion of the area of 1752 sq.ft. (approximately) described as platform and henpen as a part of the building. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority excluded the said area and assessed the fair rent on the basis of plinth area of 4850 Sq.ft. The fair rent was calculated as Rs.22403/-per month. In the revision petition filed by the landlord under Section 25 of the Act, the High Cou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.