UMESH C.BANERJEE, A.P.MISRA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Hansoli Devi – Respondent
ORDER
The issue involved in the matter under consideration pertains to Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 (as inserted by Act 68 of 1984). A three judges Bench of this Court in the case of Union of India and another v. Pradeep Kumari and others1 came to a conclusion that the starting point of limitation of 3 months as prescribed under Section 28-A for making application for re-determination of compensation ought to be the date of making of the award on the basis of which re-determination is sought. In Pradeep Kumari s case (supra) six conditions have been mentioned in order to enable a person to seek re-determination of the amount of compensation payable to him, and the above-noted six conditions are as below :
"(i) An award has been made by the court under Part III after the coming into force of Section 28-A;
(ii) By the said award the amount of compensation in excess of the amount awarded by the Collector under Section 11 has been allowed to the applicant in that reference;
(iii) The person moving the application under Section 28-A is interested in other land covered by the same notification under Section 4(1) to which t
Union of India and Anr. v. Pradeep Kumari and others
Babua Ram & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Union of India & Ors. v. Karnail Singh & Ors.
Jose Antonio Cruz Dos R. Rodriguese and another v. Land Acquisition Collector and another
State of Tripura & Anr. v. Roop Chand Das & Ors.
Jose Antonio Cruz Dos R. Rodrigueses and another v. Land Acquisition Collector and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.