JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, J.-Leave granted.

2. A suit was filed by the appellant in C.S.No.705/99 stating that it carries on business in all kinds of Quality Plywood, Laminates, Block Boards of various types by claiming that it was established in the year 1996; that it has been pioneer in marketing international standard plywood in innovative ways; that it is the sole selling agent and has distributorship and selling agency from various foreign dealers; that it has associates and business partners all over the world; that the said goods are sold with the trade marks "UNIPLY, "UNIBOARD", and

"UNIWUD" and so on the basis of which, it claims to have acquired a very high reputation amongst the Plywood and Wood product Traders, Architects, Interior Decorators, Carpenters and users of plywood boards and laminates; that it pays a very high tax both on the sale tax side and on the income tax side, that it has the registered office at Tamil Nadu and branch offices at Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh and has distributors and agents in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi and Calculla. The appellant claims to be the proprietor of the trade marks "UNIPLY" and "UNIBOARD" and has extensively advertised