SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 874

D.P.MOHAPATRA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Hamida – Appellant
Versus
Md. Kahlil – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is by the legal representatives of the plaintiff in title suit No. 13/84 filed for eviction of the defendant from the suit premises. The plaintiff filed the said suit stating that the suit premises was let out to the defendant as a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs. 125/- in the year 1972; the defendant failed to pay the rent from October, 1983; he required the suit premises reasonably and in good faith for accommodation of large number of members of his family; he has six sons, two of whom were unemployed youth and has also a grown-up unmarried daughter besides his nephew who was also umemployed. He wanted to open a shop in the outer room of suit premises just to engage his sons and nephew in the business and that he had no house in that town. The defendant had filed a suit for specific performance in respect of the same property.

3. The trial Court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for eviction and decreed the suit of the defendant filed for specific performance. The plaintiff filed appeals against judgments and decrees passed in both the suits. The first appellate court reversed them. In other words, decreed the suit












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top