SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 358

S.P.BHARUCHA, N.S.HEGDE, Y.K.SABHARWAL
Indian Poultry – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent


ORDER

The three questions which the High Court answered against the assessee read thus :

(i) Whether, on facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee, being not an industrial undertaking, it is not entitled to deduction under Section 80-I of the IT Act, 1961?

(ii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is not entitled to deduction under Section 80-HH and 80-I of the IT Act, 1961, as an industrial undertaking?

(iii) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in not following the decision of Hon ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in case of CIT v. Venkateshwara Hatchery (P) Ltd.1 which was favourable to the assessee, particularly when there was no decision of jurisdictional High Court on the point at issue?"

2. It is not in dispute that the case is covered against the assessee by the judgment of this Court in CIT v. Venkateshwara Hatcheries (P) Ltd.2. The further point that was made by the assessee was that it not only reared the chicken but also dressed them




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top