SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1181

S.N.VARIAVA, V.N.KHARE
Ulagappa – Appellant
Versus
Divn. Commnr. , Mysore – Respondent


ORDER

The respondent-State issued a notification dated 22.8.97 under Section 349 read with Section 4 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, proposing to include certain areas within the limits of Tarikere Town Panchayat. It is alleged that the residents of the local area have filed objections, but their objections were not considered. At this stage they filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court dismissed the writ petition repelling the contention raised by the petitioners. It is against the said judgment the appellants are in appeal before us.

2. During the course of hearing, we inquired from learned Counsel for the parties as to whether any final notification, including certain areas within the limits of the Tarikere Town Panchayat consequent upon the notification dated 22.8.97 has been issued or not. Learned counsel for the parties stated that so far no such notification has been issued. Under such facts and circumstances, we feel that the writ petition filed by the petitioner, was premature and ought not to have been entertained by the High Court. Merely by issue of a notification dated 22.8.97, none of the rights of the petitioner was affected. Th


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top