B.N.KIRPAL, RUMA PAL
Vidhya Dhar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
G. B. Patnaik – Respondent
ORDER
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. By order dated 22nd September, 2000, the petitioner herein was directed to be appointed to the post of Medical Officer to which he had been selected. It was further ordered that the letter of appointment should be issued within six weeks from that day.
3. When the letter of appointment was not issued, a registered A/D legal notice dated 18th November, 2000 was sent to the respondents. The notice was sent to the Chief Secretary and two other officers. Not having received any response, the present petition for taking appropriate action against the respondents was filed. In response to the petition, affidavits of G.B. Pattanaik, IAS, Secretary, Medical Education and G.D. Tripathi, IAS, Director, Ayurvedic and Unani Services, have been filed. Though in paragraph 2 of the affidavit of G.B. Patnaik an unconditional apology is purported to be tendered, it is stated that the charge has been purged, inasmuch as a letter of appointment has been issued to the petitioner. A reading of the affidavit discloses that even though G.B. Patnaik was a Secretary in the Department in September, 2000, the matter was not brought to his notice till N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.