SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 66

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.P.MOHAPATRA
National Insurance Co. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted

2. We have heard learned Counsels for the parties.

3. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 25.8.1999 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra in complaint No. C/228/1997 directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs. 5,38,500/- with interest at the rate of 15% with effect from 1.4.1996 till the date of payment, the appellant National Insurance Co. Limited filed first appeal No. 59 of 2000 under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The said appeal was summarily dismissed by a cryptic and unreasoned order which reads as follows :

"Delay condoned.

We have gone through the records of the case. We are disinclined to interfere with the order passed by the State Commission. The appeal is dismissed."

4. Hence this appeal.

5. In the order passed on 18th September, 2000 this Court while issuing notice to the respondent took note of the contention raised by the learned Counsel of the appellant that under the proviso to Section 64UM of the Insurance Act, 1938 it is open to the Insurance Company to dispute the correctness of the estimates of loss as made by the Surveyor and that the State C




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top