SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(SC) 555

2001(5) Supreme 335
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
K.T. Thomas & R.P. Sethi, JJ.
Vadluri Anjaiah -Appellant
versus
State of A.P. -Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 339 & 340 of 2001
Decided on 23-3-2001

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 -Section 320(8)-Appellants convicted under Section 354 IPC and sentenced to two years imprisonment-Appeal-Application seeking permission to compound-Permission granted-Appellants acquitted under Section 320(8) Cr.P.C. (Para 1)

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

1. Appellant stands convicted under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years as per the impugned order before us. It is now reported that appellant has come to terms with the prosecutrix-victim. An application has been filed seeking permission to compound the offence. Learned Counsel appearing for the prosecutrix submitted that it is a fact that she also had come to terms with the convicted person. Accordingly, we grant permission for compounding the offence.

2. We, therefore, acquit the appellant under Section 320(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

These appeals are disposed of accordingly.

Appeals disposed of.

****************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top